Showing posts with label Court Martial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Court Martial. Show all posts

Tuesday, 11 October 2016

Poem ~ What To Do With 'Drunken' Officers - Wednesday, 11 October - Sunday, 15 October 1916

Impression sketch for What To Do With 'Drunken' Officers.

i
In a number of insubordinations, various
Appearances of officers stood before
Major-General Lord Cheylesmore, who
Presided at a court-martial, Westminster.

A Commandant of Bisley Camp School
Of musketry, who had in his youth been
Described as an all round sportsman -
Though 'a little too eager to shoot birds.'

Eager Major-General Lord Cheylesmore 
Was fond of 'teaching the young idea
To shoot' - along with Karl Hans Lody trial
He had many court-martials under his belt.

Major-General Lord Cheylesmore now
Turned his talents to home grown issues -
He faced an accused Second Lieutenant
F. L. Whalley, who had pleaded not guilty.

A charge held on the Lieutenant as drunk
On 6 September 1916, at the Wimbledon
Common camp, 10.45 p.m. - the court
Listened to how Whalley's story unfolded.

A taxi cab driver appeared at servant's
Hut on the camp, asking for Lieutenant
Whalley's servant Private Donovan, who
He addressed, to request the officer’s fare.

The driver had refused the idea of being
Given a cheque - although not very clear,
Private Andrews likely went to officers
Mess, to inform another officer of events.

A further witness confirmed how Lieutenant
Whalley was slumped on his bed to appear
Drunk - in shaking him he asked him what
He was going to do; 'give the man a cheque.'

Whalley asked them to write this for him -
Private Donovan advised the driver a cheque
For 25s would be posted - in his evidence
Whalley informed court of personal worries.

Since late August his concerns centred 
About his wife having recently given birth -
On 5 September he had been all day at the
Nursing home, returning to camp at 9 p.m.

He could not sleep so then returned
To the nursing home by 1 a.m., where
Two Doctors held no hope for his wife.
In addition the child would not survive.

Staying there for many hours he finally
Left 9 p.m. Whalley took a taxi to stop
At a hotel, to drink 3 sodas and brandies
He had not eaten - but nor was he drunk.

Collapse came from mental worry and
Physical exertion - court then heard how
Whalley had been in army 11 years with
4 years active service in South Africa.

During that time no crime had been made
Against him - a letter was provided by late 
Lord Roberts to Whalley's parents, to say 
He had been part of his close bodyguard.

Whalley carried out his duties smartly,
As a keen soldier - while Captain Neale
Advised he proved to be excellent officer
And popular with colleagues and men.

ii
From Bedfordshire Yeomanry stood
Second Lieutenant H. E. R. Craig, to be
Accused that on 16 September 1916 he 
Was at Empire Music Hall Promenade.

He was found dancing whilst in uniform.
Captain T. V. Brown, Assistant Provost
Marshal of Australian Force, saw Craig
Step dancing, his arm around a civilian.

Captain Brown spoke to Craig to say his
Behaviour did not become an officer -
The Lieutenant replied he was not doing
Any harm - the Captain asked for his card.

The reply was, 'I have not got any,' to add
Was his word not good enough? then given
An order to report on Monday. 'I cannot
Do it' - then Craig followed Captain Brown.

Craig had asked for Brown's card in order
He may lodge a complaint; at 11.15 p.m.
A Captain Cameron asked him, after what
Brown had said, why did he follow him?

Craig denied he followed Brown - asked
Again if he understood he was to report
To the Provost-Marshals office the next
Morning - the reply was, 'I cannot report.'

After repeating that he must report, Craig
Was told not to loiter but go on his way -
Giving back reply, 'I shall stay where I like.'
At that point he was arrested and taken.

Travelling quietly in the taxicab Craig was
Quite sober - at Scotland Yard Lieutenant
Craig was put into a cell, to perform steps
Of a dance as the door was being locked.

Lieutenant Craig faced court-marshal over
3 charges of insubordination to a superior
Officer - this he denied, stating how he had
Only been at Promenade talking to a friend.

Further to explain that after being led into
The cell, where all the windows were open,
Lieutenant Craig stamped his feet to keep
Warm and that he had not been dancing.

iii
Second Lieutenant A. E. N. Phillips, an
Officer of the Royal Garrison Artillery sent
A telegram to the Anti Aircraft company,
Commander Captain Rotteburg one Saturday.

His words, 'kindly excuse me parade this
Morning: unavoidably detained.' Without word
Until Monday 18 September, to say by wire
He would report Tuesday with explanations.

Second Lieutenant A. E. N. Phillips was
Actually absent from Friday 15 to Tuesday
19 September - in his decision not to give
Any explanations, he instead gave evidence.

Stating that his section had no weekend duty,
Phillips had not realised that there were strict
Regulations in what his absence had meant -
If known he would not have taken time away.

Lieutenant Phillips defended his character,
To state he had been in the Matabeleland
And Natal Mounted Police, South Africa -
Having gained medals prior to his arrival.

He had decided to leave his police post there
To travel to England and fight for the Empire.
Having heard evidence, the court remained
Undecided on Lieutenant Phillips sentence.

Vi
On another day, without any connection,
A second Lieutenant of the Australian
Imperial Force, G. D. Lemon, had been
Present in London, 23 September 1916.

Second Lieutenant Lemon faced charges
Of drunken behaviour in Leicester Square
10.30 p.m. when he should have reported
To camp, catching his train from Waterloo.

Missing the 5.50 p.m. train that evening,
Lemon advised he was unaware of having
To get a specific train - he met an Australian
Friend, intending to travel to camp with them.

Lemon planned his return Sunday morning.
His promotion to rank of Second Lieutenant
From private had occurred in 1916; a court
Martial existed from August, for being drunk.

With Lieutenant Lemon's sentence yet to be
Decided, as was Second Lieutenant Phillips,
Lieutenant Craig, the keen, sober dancer's
Summing up said 'not guilty' - while Whalley's
Concerns for his wife, was found 'not guilty.'

by Jamie Mann.

Anon.,1916. Courts-Martial - Charges Against Officers. The Daily Telegraph, [online] 7 October 1916. P.x14. Col.1. Available at: <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ww1-archive/12213397/Daily-Telegraph-October-7-1916.html> [Accessed: 11 October 2016].

Mann, J., 2016. 100 years Ago - Poems by Jamie Mann. [letter] (Personal communication, 11 October 2016). 



#WW1 #WW1centenary #GreatWar #WW1poem #GreatWar #WW1centenary #worldwarone #worldwaroneremembered #WW1London

Sunday, 2 October 2016

Poem ~ Poster Protest of War - Monday, 02 October - Tuesday, 03 October 1916

Source: File: No Conscription Fellowship National Committee meeting May 1916. (Front row left to right: C.H. Norman, Dr Alfred Salter, Aylmer Rose, Fenner Brockway, Clifford Allen, Edward Grubb, Will Chamberlain, Catherine Marshall. Standing left to right: Rev. Leyton Richards, Morgan Jones, John P. Fletcher, A Barratt Brown, and Bertrand Russell.) See an original image at: <http://www.ppu.org.uk/cosnew/cos08.html> [Accessed 2 October 2016]

When nations had emerged in their actions
Of war, opposition formed soon after, as in
The organisation of the No Conscription
Fellowship - initiated from autumn 1914
Fenner Brockway, editor of an anti-war
Paper, appealed to any man against conflict.

With the No Conscription Fellowship quickly
Gaining 300 members, the organisation's
Statement of Faith followed - these men
Refused to bear arms in beliefs of human
Life as sacred; they could not inflict death.
Till then army recruits had been voluntary.

Soon though, facts emerged that in order
To maintain high numbers for the army,
Conscription would be introduced -
The No Conscription Fellowship had
Grown stronger with members ironically
Prepared to fight for their passive beliefs.

A type of male suffrage movement in rights
To refuse to fight, with countrywide branches
Formed to campaign against compulsory
Military Service Bill - conscientious objectors
Set out to equally make refusal to take part
In any war work, or involvement of military.

In their stand members appeared at tribunals
And court martial's - all of which were carefully
Recorded - No Conscription Fellowship press
Department set to publicise frequently often
Brutal treatment of their members, their arrests  
And forceful detainment in prison and camps.

No let up was given by members' missions -
As on last day of September - Saturday
30 1916 when an appearance was made by
Journalist Edward Fuller, called to Stratford
Police court - the offence charged against
Him made under Defence of the Realm Act.

Actions taken by Edward Fuller were stated
As likely to prejudice the forces recruitment
Administration and military discipline -
Acting on Fuller's defence was Mr Hawkin,
With Mr Bodkin for Director of Public
Prosecutions, centring on use of posters.

28 August 1916 had seen arrival of a letter
To Mr Abrahams, proprietor of Borough
Theatre Bill Posting Company - a request
Asked costs in posting Double Crown Bills,
To be posted in busy districts of Stratford,
Woodford, Forest Gate and Wanstead.

With the letter was a copy of the poster,
Which set to publicize a quote from a trial,
That made prosecutions of eight members
Of the No Conscription Fellowship - words
Spoken by A. H. Bodkin K.C.  having acted 
In role of public prosecutor, 17 May 1916.

'War will become impossible, if all men
Were to have the view that war is wrong.'
Was stated by Mr Bodkin, an eminent lawyer
Of the Kings Council - repeating his stand
At bringing Edward Fuller to trial, whose 
Intent was to post these misquoted words.

The suggestion of this statement by Bodkin
Was to take them out of context, to publicise
This as a public prosecutors view of the war -
Mr Abrahams replied to Mr Fuller with costs,
To also ask if they had war office sanctioned
The posters to show them in public situations.

For the defence, Mr Hawkins interactions
With Mr Abrahams was for a straightforward
Business transaction - a 'molehill had then
Been turned into a mountain,' - yet an input
From Brigadier General Childs, voiced how
Conscientious objectors wasted army time.

1,700 COs had so far been court-martialled -
Mr Hawkins gave the court a reminder how
Movement's intent was to cause the war
Office problems - that showing those words
Could do no real harm; Mr Fuller had not set
Out to disrupt recruitment, it was technical.

'War will become impossible, if all men
Were to have the view that war is wrong,'
Suggested that if everyone held that belief
Of war being unlawful, no war could take
Place; the Bench concluded Fuller was just
A dupe and not to be automatically detained.

Given choice of 121 fine and costs, Edward 
Fuller had the alternative of 90 days in goal.

by Jamie Mann.

Anon.,1916. Prejudicing Recruiting - Objector Fine £100. The Daily Telegraph, [online] 2 October 1916. P.5. Col.3. Available at: <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ww1-archive/12213365/Daily-Telegraph-October-2-1916.html> [Accessed: 2 October 2016].

Source: File: Conscientious Objection: No-Conscription Fellowship. Available at: <http://www.ppu.org.uk/cosnew/cos04a.html> [Accessed 2 October 2016]

Mann, J., 2016. 100 years Ago - Poems by Jamie Mann. [letter] (Personal communication, 2 October 2016). 



#WW1 #WW1centenary #GreatWar #WW1poem #GreatWar #WW1centenary #worldwarone #worldwaroneremembered #WW1conscientiousobjectors

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

Poem ~ Troopers Mutiny - Thursday, 16 March 1916


Impression sketch for Troopers Mutiny - by Jamie.

One certain regiment of a county laying
Within the capital county of London,
Made a show of discontent by way
Of mutiny - amid 5th supernumerary
Company, 9th Battalion Middlesex
Regiment, made private disobedience.

Until a call to war of eighteen months
Before, the Territorial Force of 1908
Had struggled as a home defence -
Three months in, the national reserves
Formed into Protection Companies,
To guard vulnerable home targets.

The protective force saw modification
By March 1915, into supernumerary
Companies - on Parade of 19 February
1916, a new guard inspection made
Witness to actions by three privates,
Towards others of rank into a mutiny.

The Saturday saw a supernumerary
Company on parade ground - amid
Them, a Private Thomas Walker,
Private William Frederick Williams,
And Private Fredrick Charles Poole;
All present for guard inspection.

Superiors of rank overseeing men
Included Lieutenant Anderson and
Lieutenant D'Oyly, while Sergeant
Melroy paraded the guard - already
Known among them was discontent,
As the Sergeant called out orders.

First of the three Private Walker,
At the call of Sergeant Melroy
To 'Right turn,' then stepped away
And said 'Don't do it boy's!' to be
Arrested - another Private Williams
Had separated from the ranks.

Amidst murmurings of rising
Discontent, Lieutenant Anderson
Gave Williams an order to step
Back to the ranks - the private
Made hesitation, wanting to air
His complaint to the officer.

His later statement told how
He had not heard order to step
Back, due the shouting noises
At the time - Private Poole was
To follow in arrest, by trying
To persuade others to mutiny.

Lieutenant Anderson after act
Of the second arrest, warned
The men of their serious nature
To disobey orders - he could
Only hear individual complaints
Not collective voices of the men.

'Right turn,' was given by Lieutenant
Anderson. The force obeyed, except
For two, one of who then followed
A repeated order - the other stepped
Forward and called out, effectively
With words, 'throw down your arms!'

Wednesday 15 March 1916, a Court
Martial hearing by Major General
Lord Cheylesmore, saw the three
Accused - two charged to instigate
Mutiny and the other in disobeying
A lawful command by senior officer.

Private Walker’s statement stated
The men's complaint came from
A so-called 'rest' order - how most
Of the men on 18 February had
Been on duty for eighteen hours;
'Not having been treated like man.'

The statement was backed up by
Two other soldiers - while Private
Williams, in having 30 years service
In varied units, had never been part
Of any crime - Williams in 1914 had
Been a sergeant at St James Palace.

The disorganised parade had proved
A tinderbox of discontent for soldiers
Complaints, amid shouting of orders
By officers and men alike - accused
Called witnesses, who backed them;
Court's decision was not announced.

by Jamie Mann.

Anon.,1916. Alleged Camp Mutiny - Soldiers Court-Martialled. The Daily Telegraph, [online] 15 March 1916. P.11. Col.4. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ww1-archive/12193873/Daily-Telegraph-March-15-1916.html [Accessed: 16 March 2016].

Source: File: Reserves and Reservists. Online. Available at: <http://www.1914-1918.net/reserve.htm> Accessed 16 March 2016

Mann, J., 2016. 100 years Ago - Poems by Jamie Mann. [letter] (Personal communication, 16 March 2016). 



#WW1 #WW1centenary #WW1poem #GreatWar #WW1centenary #worldwarone #worldwaroneremembered #WW1HomeFront

Friday, 22 January 2016

Poem ~ Deserters Death Penalty - Saturday, 22 January 1916


Source: File: Harold John "Jack" Tennant.jpg. [online] see an original image at: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Tennant> Accessed: 22 January 2016].

The deadly deed had already begun,
In regard to accusations of desertion -
As given to the under secretary
Of State for War, the Liberal Scottish
Politician Harold John Jack Tennant.

The matter raised came from event
Of court martial, that had taken
Place a year before in France -
Private Thomas Hope, An Irish
Soldier with the 2nd Leinster Rgt.

Private Hope on duty on the front
Line was given orders - being
Detailed to make his way back
To the rear line to collect rations;
The soldier did not reappear.

Some weeks passed until Hope
Was discovered - to be promptly
Court-martialed for desertion.
It was heard how on his impulse
Was a reaction to brothers deaths.

Both Thomas Hope's brothers
Had been killed taking part
In action - In distress he fled
On 23 December 1914 to be
Placed on trial 14 February 1915.

A statement at the time given
By Government, laid out
Fact how that it was known
To all soldiers that any acts of
Desertion had a death penalty.

Almost one year after, business 
of the House of Commons Friday 
12 January 1916, included
a renewed challenge, that came
From Mr Farrell to Mr Tennant.

The resultant faulty military trial 
ended in Private Hope's sentence
To death - his name contrary 
To his situation - to be informed
Barely 12 hours before the act.

Mr Farrell raised accusations
Of Hope's deserting duty post -
How the trial lacked any gravity
Of the situation being conveyed
To Private Thomas Hope.

There was the belief how Hope
Was only told of his execution
Sentence, only an hour before -
Mr Farrell therefore challenged
The reliability of the court's action.

Had any advocate been provided
To Hope? Or lawful interval given
For any decision to be reviewed?
Did sentence reflect regulations?
Or take regard of prior bravery?

Farrell said Private Thomas Hope
Had proved himself in trench
Fighting, to show he was neither
A shirker or a coward - a reply
Came from secretary in writing. 

The worded reply of Mr Tennant
Told how Private Hope charged
With minor misdemeanors, along
With desertion, at field general
Court-martial; 14 February 1915.

In reference to evidence of Hope
Being absent from trenches,
Between 23 December 1914,
Until 9 February 1915, sentence
Was later passed on 14 February.

The advice was that a review
Had been made over 13 days,
When Commander in Chief
Confirmed, according to law,
The death sentence on Hope.

The Secretary of state stated
How the accused had not given
any type of evidence - Nor any 
reference to acts of bravery 
Being raised during Hope's trial.

Mr Tenant’s reply suggested how
Obvious it was; that any court
Martial cannot be subjected
To any kind of counsel - in any
Field of war military law was final.

by Jamie Mann.

Anon.,1916. Sentence of Death - A Case at the Front. The Daily Telegraph, [online] 22 January 1916. P.6. Col.3. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ww1-archive/12108572/Daily-Telegraph-January-22-1916.html [Accessed: 22 January 2016].

Mann, J., 2016. 100 years Ago - Poems by Jamie Mann. [letter] (Personal communication, 22 January 2016). 



#WW1 #WW1centenary #GreatWar #WW1poem #GreatWar #WW1centenary #worldwarone #worldwaroneremembered #WW1London

Thursday, 7 January 2016

Poem ~ Italian Spy In France - Friday, 7 January 1916

Source: File:Marseille Port.jpg. [online] An original image is Available at: <http://www.marseilletourisme.fr/histoire-du-vieux-port-en-images/> [Accessed: 7 January 2016]


An Italian born man, naturalised
As Swiss and Argentine, lived
In Paris - under the name Pasi
He had worked as a German spy.

Pasi had been traveling between
Paris and Marseilles, to obtain
Information; this included detail
On a new long-range French gun.

Troop movements about Paris
Came under Pasi's scrutiny -
Along with French movements
Of the navy situated in Marseilles.

Particular interest was on Kleber
Battleship's sailing departure -
Pasi's contacts based at Geneva
And Barcelona to receive letters.

The correspondence of Pasi
Had been intercepted - the result
Was the man's arrest in Paris;
Held by court martial for trial.

Exclusion of public and press
In 'trial by camera' had unanimous
Sentence, devoid of extenuating
Circumstances, in death penalty.

by Jamie Mann.

Anon.,1916. Espionage in France - Sentence of Death. The Daily Telegraph, [online] 7 January 1916. P.11. Col.2. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ww1-archive/12083261/Daily-Telegraph-January-7-1916.html [Accessed: 7 January 2016].

Mann, J., 2016. 100 years Ago - Poems by Jamie Mann. [letter] (Personal communication, 7 January 2016). 



#WW1 #WW1centenary #GreatWar #WW1poem #GreatWar #WW1centenary #worldwarone #worldwaroneremembered #WW1France